富の偏在と対策１
今、地球上でも、問題になっている、事柄は、ずばり、２つある。
１つは、富の偏在、２つ目は、環境問題である。
この２つに、ついて今後、述べていきたいと思う。
１つ目の、富の偏在の原因について考えていきた。
１：これは、現在の年金制度だけでは、やっていけない事にある。
実際に、日本では、老人の生活保護受給者の急増が
問題となっている。若者にいたっては、年金額を減らす、
今の制度では、今後、更に、この状態がひどくなることは、
明らかである。
以上のことを、考えると、どうしても、税制改革を行い、
歳入を増やして、困窮者を救済して行かなければならない。
これを、歳入と、歳出の両面で考えていくことにする。
歳入は、累進課税の強化と、政治家、医者、弁護士、富裕層への
税負担の強化をすべきである。
富裕税について、詳しいことは、インターネットで調べて下さい。
政治家は、選挙活動を、昔からの方法から、インターネットを使った
お金のかからない、選挙活動に切り替えて、政党助成金を減らすべきである。
役所の経費も、インターネット、イントラネット（グループだけのネット）
などの活用で、４０％削減すべきである。コンビニに、極力、業務委託
して、経費節減をはかるべきである。
企業･団体献金と政党助成金の合計額を、ある一定の上限を設けて行くべきだ。
そして、それに対しては、株、投資信託、FXなどの投資と同じ、２０％の
税金をかけていくべきである。更に、公務員給料を、民間給料の８０％と
きめて、支出していくできである。
続いて、企業についてであるが、毎年、積み上がっていく、
利益剰余金（内部留保）やネットキャッシュに、消費税８％を
課税すべきである。また、企業の海外剰余金にも同じく消費税
８％を課税するのである。ただ、海外から日本に、剰余金を
移動させれば、還付金３％還元するとか、優遇していくと良い。
そして、税制も、累進課税のもどすか、
多額収入者の税優遇措置を辞めるべきである。
多額収入者の税優遇措置を辞めるべきである。
以上の事で、財源を確保していくべきである。
続いて、困窮者の救済という側面から考えてみる。
困窮者の定義を明確にしておく必要があるで、いくつか、
実例を、書いてみる。
まず、病気、怪我などで、年金受給前から、収入を得られない人
（身障者は別）については、一定のマイナスの税金（給付金）を
与えるようにすべきである。
今の、税制で、ある一定収入以下の人（年齢制限あり）には、
収入０の人で、１人当たり、月５万円、６０万円／年とか、
支給するのである。（もちろん、支給希望者には、預貯金、
所有財産の証明書の提出を求める。抜け道をふさぐ）
所有財産の証明書の提出を求める。抜け道をふさぐ）
そして、赤ちゃんがいるとか、家族構成などを加味して、
１世帯の給付上限も決めておく。
文章だけでは、わかりにくいので、まとめてみる。
富の偏在解消の具体的な方策
歳入増加の内訳
１：政治家、医者、弁護士、富裕層への税負担の強化
２：政党助成金の減額（ネット利用での効率化）
３：政治献金･政党給付金への８％（消費税）の課税
４：役所の外部委託促進で、公務員減少と議員定数削減
５：企業の内部留保金･海外留保金への課税８％
６：寄付金の税控除の簡素化で、募金･寄付金を増やす。
７：医療費の赤字は、ジェネリック活用
（先発品との差額の一部個人負担へ）
（先発品との差額の一部個人負担へ）
歳出増加の内訳
１：マイナスの税金（給付金）の実施で、生活保護を減らす。
２：子どものいる家庭の補助金拡充（子ども手当･拡充）
これでも、財源が、足りなくければ、将来的の人口が減少
に伴い、議員定数の大幅削減、国の遊休土地、株式、
債券の売却で、海外財産などで、財源を確保すべき。
もう一つ、最近の世界中でおきてる、事前災害、洪水、渇水、
海面上昇、台風の超巨大化などの、地球温暖化対策（環境問題）
これについても、大変大きな問題で、早く、有効な方法を
考えなければ、持続可能な社会の継続できなくなる。
つまり、地球に、人類が、住めなくなると言うこと。
そして、米国を中心に、弱肉強食の、富の争奪戦が、依然として
行われて、環境破壊は、進んでいくばかりである。
その被害額は、膨大な金額である。
富の創出の金額＞自然災害の被害額（昔）
富の創出の金額＜自然災害の被害額（現在）
悪いシナリオ（地球滅亡の危機）
富の創出の金額＜＜自然災害の被害額（現在）
＊ここで、考えなければならない重要な点は、
どんなに家庭の収入が増えても、家の修理費や、
家族の医療費が、増えすぎると、家計も破産すると言う事である。
これと同じ事が、現在の地球で起きてるという事を、全人類が
自覚すべき時が、来ていると言うことを自覚すべきだ！
この話は、また、近いうちに書くことにしよう。またね・・
Now, even on the earth, the matter is problematic, there are two things frankly.
One is the uneven distribution of wealth, the second one is an environmental problem.
I would like to talk about these two in the future.
I was thinking about the cause of the uneven distribution of wealth.
1: It is in the thing that can not do with the current pension system alone.
In fact, in Japan, the surge of elderly people receiving welfare benefits
It is a problem. For young people, reducing the annual amount,
In the current system, it is furthermore that this condition becomes severe,
it is obvious.
Considering the above, I definitely have to reform the tax system,
We have to increase revenues and relieve the needy and go.
I will consider this in terms of both revenue and expenditure.
Revenue, strengthening progressive taxation, to politicians, doctors, lawyers, wealthy people
Tax burden should be strengthened.
For further information on wealth tax, please look it up on the internet.
Politicians used election campaigns from the old way, the Internet
We should switch to electoral activities, not money, and reduce political party subsidies.
Costs of the government office are Internet, intranet (group only net)
By utilizing such as 40% reduction should be. Outsourcing to the convenience store as much as possible
It should be cost savings.
We should set a certain upper limit on the total amount of company and organization donations and political party subsidies.
And for that, it is the same as the investment of stocks, investment trusts, FX etc., 20%
You should pay taxes. Furthermore, paying civil service salaries to 80% of private salary
It is possible to decide and spend money.
Next, concerning the company, every year it will build up,
8% consumption tax on retained earnings (retained earnings) and net cash
Taxation should be done. Also, the surplus surplus of the company also includes consumption tax
8% will be taxed. However, to Japan from overseas, surplus
If you move it, it is good to give 3% refund or to give preferential treatment.
And, as for the tax system, whether to return progressive taxation,
You should quit a tax incentive for a large income.
With the above, we should secure funding sources.
Next, let us consider it from the aspect of salvation of needy people.
It is necessary to clarify the definition of needy people, some,
I will write an example.
First of all, people who can not earn income from diseases, injuries, etc. before receiving pension
(Disabled persons), a certain minus tax (benefit)
You should give.
Currently, with the tax system, people under a certain income
(with age restriction)
People with income 0, per capita, 50,000 yen a month,
600,000 yen / year,
I will pay it. (Of course, for those who want to pay, deposits and savings,
Request the submission of certificate of possession property. Close the way out)
And, taking into account the baby's presence, family composition,
We also decide the upper limit of benefits for one household.
Because it is hard to understand by sentences alone,
I will summarize it.
Specific measures for uneven distribution of wealth
Breakdown of revenue increase
1: Enhancement of tax burden on politicians, doctors, lawyers, rich people
2: Reduction of political party subsidies (streamlining efficiency with Internet use)
3: Taxation on 8% (consumption tax) on political donation / political party benefit
4: Promotion of outsourcing of the government office, reduction of
civil servants and reduction of parliamentarians
5: Corporate internal reserves · Taxation on foreign reserves 8%
6: Increase donation / donation by simplifying deductible tax deduction.
7: Medical expenses deficit is generic
(Partial burden of difference with the original product)
Breakdown of expenditure increase
1: Reduce livelihood protection by implementing negative taxes (benefits).
2: Enhance subsidies for families with children
(child allowance / expansion)
Again, if the financial resources are insufficient, the future population will decrease
Along with the drastic reduction of the number of parliamentarians, idle land of the country, stocks,
In the sale of bonds, we should secure financial resources with overseas assets etc.
Another, recently occurring all over the world, advance disaster, flood, drought,
Global warming countermeasures (environmental problems)
such as sea level rise, huge typhoons,
As for this, it is a very big problem, quick and effective way
If you do not think about it, you will not be able to continue
a sustainable society.
That is to say that human beings can not live on the earth.
And, mainly in the United States, the fight of wealth, still weak
The destruction of the environment is just going on.
The damage amount is a huge amount of money.
Amount of wealth creation> Amount of damage of
natural disasters (old days)
Amount of wealth creation <Amount of damage of
natural disasters (present)
Bad Scenario (Crisis of the Earth's Destruction)
Amount of wealth creation << Damage of natural disasters (present)
* Here, the important point to consider is
No matter how much household income increases, the repair cost of the house,
If the family's medical expenses increase too much, household will also bankrupt.
The same thing happens on the present earth, all humanity
You should be aware that the time to realize is coming!
I will write this story again soon.
See you··
Now, even on the earth, the matter is problematic, there are two things frankly.
One is the uneven distribution of wealth, the second one is an environmental problem.
I would like to talk about these two in the future.
I was thinking about the cause of the uneven distribution of wealth.
1: It is in the thing that can not do with the current pension system alone.
In fact, in Japan, the surge of elderly people receiving welfare benefits
It is a problem. For young people, reducing the annual amount,
In the current system, it is furthermore that this condition becomes severe,
it is obvious.
Considering the above, I definitely have to reform the tax system,
We have to increase revenues and relieve the needy and go.
I will consider this in terms of both revenue and expenditure.
Revenue, strengthening progressive taxation, to politicians, doctors, lawyers, wealthy people
Tax burden should be strengthened.
For further information on wealth tax, please look it up on the internet.
Politicians used election campaigns from the old way, the Internet
We should switch to electoral activities, not money, and reduce political party subsidies.
Costs of the government office are Internet, intranet (group only net)
By utilizing such as 40% reduction should be. Outsourcing to the convenience store as much as possible
It should be cost savings.
We should set a certain upper limit on the total amount of company and organization donations and political party subsidies.
And for that, it is the same as the investment of stocks, investment trusts, FX etc., 20%
You should pay taxes. Furthermore, paying civil service salaries to 80% of private salary
It is possible to decide and spend money.
Next, concerning the company, every year it will build up,
8% consumption tax on retained earnings (retained earnings) and net cash
Taxation should be done. Also, the surplus surplus of the company also includes consumption tax
8% will be taxed. However, to Japan from overseas, surplus
If you move it, it is good to give 3% refund or to give preferential treatment.
And, as for the tax system, whether to return progressive taxation,
You should quit a tax incentive for a large income.
With the above, we should secure funding sources.
Next, let us consider it from the aspect of salvation of needy people.
It is necessary to clarify the definition of needy people, some,
I will write an example.
First of all, people who can not earn income from diseases, injuries, etc. before receiving pension
(Disabled persons), a certain minus tax (benefit)
You should give.
Currently, with the tax system, people under a certain income
(with age restriction)
People with income 0, per capita, 50,000 yen a month,
600,000 yen / year,
I will pay it. (Of course, for those who want to pay, deposits and savings,
Request the submission of certificate of possession property. Close the way out)
And, taking into account the baby's presence, family composition,
We also decide the upper limit of benefits for one household.
Because it is hard to understand by sentences alone,
I will summarize it.
Specific measures for uneven distribution of wealth
Breakdown of revenue increase
1: Enhancement of tax burden on politicians, doctors, lawyers, rich people
2: Reduction of political party subsidies (streamlining efficiency with Internet use)
3: Taxation on 8% (consumption tax) on political donation / political party benefit
4: Promotion of outsourcing of the government office, reduction of
civil servants and reduction of parliamentarians
5: Corporate internal reserves · Taxation on foreign reserves 8%
6: Increase donation / donation by simplifying deductible tax deduction.
7: Medical expenses deficit is generic
(Partial burden of difference with the original product)
Breakdown of expenditure increase
1: Reduce livelihood protection by implementing negative taxes (benefits).
2: Enhance subsidies for families with children
(child allowance / expansion)
Again, if the financial resources are insufficient, the future population will decrease
Along with the drastic reduction of the number of parliamentarians, idle land of the country, stocks,
In the sale of bonds, we should secure financial resources with overseas assets etc.
Another, recently occurring all over the world, advance disaster, flood, drought,
Global warming countermeasures (environmental problems)
such as sea level rise, huge typhoons,
As for this, it is a very big problem, quick and effective way
If you do not think about it, you will not be able to continue
a sustainable society.
That is to say that human beings can not live on the earth.
And, mainly in the United States, the fight of wealth, still weak
The destruction of the environment is just going on.
The damage amount is a huge amount of money.
Amount of wealth creation> Amount of damage of
natural disasters (old days)
Amount of wealth creation <Amount of damage of
natural disasters (present)
Bad Scenario (Crisis of the Earth's Destruction)
Amount of wealth creation << Damage of natural disasters (present)
* Here, the important point to consider is
No matter how much household income increases, the repair cost of the house,
If the family's medical expenses increase too much, household will also bankrupt.
The same thing happens on the present earth, all humanity
You should be aware that the time to realize is coming!
I will write this story again soon.
See you··
コメント